<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: How I Solved My Facebook Pollution Problem (Turns Out It Wasn&#8217;t Facebook That Was Polluted&#8230;)</title>
	<atom:link href="http://lauriefoley.com/2009/04/facebook-pollution/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://lauriefoley.com/2009/04/facebook-pollution/</link>
	<description>Online Business Coach - Atlanta, GA</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 16 May 2012 05:12:46 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Laurie</title>
		<link>http://lauriefoley.com/2009/04/facebook-pollution/comment-page-1/#comment-47</link>
		<dc:creator>Laurie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Apr 2009 22:47:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lauriefoley.com/?p=675#comment-47</guid>
		<description>@Rhett:  It never fails to delight me when a link pulls a fellow blogger into the conversation.  Thank you for dropping by.

What I found most compelling (and novel) in your excellent article was the idea that sending one&#039;s tweets to FB means that FB is then easy to ignore. There are lots of alluring social networks but I don&#039;t understand connecting to them for broadcast purposes only.  That just seems to dilute the overall power of the network.

Call me a believer in authentic connection, even in these electronic realms...  Thanks again for helping shape these evolving ideas.  I would love to chat with you about coaching - will email you. 

@Maura - dear one!  The turfs of Ireland indeed.  You don&#039;t think these wires, keyboards and screens are the modern peat bogs?  I certainly hear your muses when I start to write; we&#039;re probably spading together more than we realize.  It would certainly be more fun to share these comments while quaffing an ale in person though ;-).

I think I may have mistakenly buried my lead on that synchronicity - that really was the coolest part.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Rhett:  It never fails to delight me when a link pulls a fellow blogger into the conversation.  Thank you for dropping by.</p>
<p>What I found most compelling (and novel) in your excellent article was the idea that sending one&#8217;s tweets to FB means that FB is then easy to ignore. There are lots of alluring social networks but I don&#8217;t understand connecting to them for broadcast purposes only.  That just seems to dilute the overall power of the network.</p>
<p>Call me a believer in authentic connection, even in these electronic realms&#8230;  Thanks again for helping shape these evolving ideas.  I would love to chat with you about coaching &#8211; will email you. </p>
<p>@Maura &#8211; dear one!  The turfs of Ireland indeed.  You don&#8217;t think these wires, keyboards and screens are the modern peat bogs?  I certainly hear your muses when I start to write; we&#8217;re probably spading together more than we realize.  It would certainly be more fun to share these comments while quaffing an ale in person though <img src='http://lauriefoley.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';-)' class='wp-smiley' /> .</p>
<p>I think I may have mistakenly buried my lead on that synchronicity &#8211; that really was the coolest part.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Maura</title>
		<link>http://lauriefoley.com/2009/04/facebook-pollution/comment-page-1/#comment-46</link>
		<dc:creator>Maura</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Apr 2009 22:09:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lauriefoley.com/?p=675#comment-46</guid>
		<description>I agree. I&#039;d been growling about the same issue (business Tweets on Facebook) as well.
It made me pine for the olden days -- oh, a good spade in the turf fields of Ireland &amp; conversation the old fashioned way.   
I appreciate your comment about the synchronicity i.e. you untangle your thoughts on an issue and people respond accordingly.  If one de-pollutes, they will come. It works.
Thanks Laurie for your wonderful thoughts and writing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree. I&#8217;d been growling about the same issue (business Tweets on Facebook) as well.<br />
It made me pine for the olden days &#8212; oh, a good spade in the turf fields of Ireland &amp; conversation the old fashioned way.<br />
I appreciate your comment about the synchronicity i.e. you untangle your thoughts on an issue and people respond accordingly.  If one de-pollutes, they will come. It works.<br />
Thanks Laurie for your wonderful thoughts and writing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rhett Smith</title>
		<link>http://lauriefoley.com/2009/04/facebook-pollution/comment-page-1/#comment-45</link>
		<dc:creator>Rhett Smith</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Apr 2009 15:10:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lauriefoley.com/?p=675#comment-45</guid>
		<description>Laurie,

Thanks for the blog link, I appreciate it.  I&quot;m glad you found it helpful.  Great post, and lots of great thinking through and reasoning on pulling Twitter.  It&#039;s a tough decision...I like the &quot;polluted&quot; idea...never thought of it in those terms.  

Rhett

ps would love to connect sometime about your life coaching.  I&#039;m a licensed marriage and family therapy associate currently, and looking into doing some coaching at some point.

&lt;abbr&gt;&lt;em&gt;Rhett Smith’s last blog post..&lt;a href=&quot;http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/rhettsmith/~3/hrMWp80VV7c/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;&#8220;How am I going to do this?&#8221;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/abbr&gt;&lt;/em&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Laurie,</p>
<p>Thanks for the blog link, I appreciate it.  I&#8221;m glad you found it helpful.  Great post, and lots of great thinking through and reasoning on pulling Twitter.  It&#8217;s a tough decision&#8230;I like the &#8220;polluted&#8221; idea&#8230;never thought of it in those terms.  </p>
<p>Rhett</p>
<p>ps would love to connect sometime about your life coaching.  I&#8217;m a licensed marriage and family therapy associate currently, and looking into doing some coaching at some point.</p>
<p><abbr><em>Rhett Smith’s last blog post..<a href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/rhettsmith/~3/hrMWp80VV7c/" rel="nofollow">&#8220;How am I going to do this?&#8221;</a></em></abbr></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: patrick</title>
		<link>http://lauriefoley.com/2009/04/facebook-pollution/comment-page-1/#comment-44</link>
		<dc:creator>patrick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Apr 2009 00:33:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lauriefoley.com/?p=675#comment-44</guid>
		<description>Oops! I should have said &quot;where I want them to stay.&quot; I know a lot of people are like me: they hooked up fb and twitter because it&#039;s convenient, but then started to consider dumping the app because the two things really aren&#039;t quite compatible. Along came &quot;selective twitter status&quot; and solved that problem (for me at least).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oops! I should have said &#8220;where I want them to stay.&#8221; I know a lot of people are like me: they hooked up fb and twitter because it&#8217;s convenient, but then started to consider dumping the app because the two things really aren&#8217;t quite compatible. Along came &#8220;selective twitter status&#8221; and solved that problem (for me at least).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Laurie</title>
		<link>http://lauriefoley.com/2009/04/facebook-pollution/comment-page-1/#comment-43</link>
		<dc:creator>Laurie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Apr 2009 22:13:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lauriefoley.com/?p=675#comment-43</guid>
		<description>Thanks, Patrick.  This is great to know, too.   &quot;harmlessly on twitter&quot; - heh heh.  Are you trying to stir up my polluted thoughts again? :^D</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks, Patrick.  This is great to know, too.   &#8220;harmlessly on twitter&#8221; &#8211; heh heh.  Are you trying to stir up my polluted thoughts again? :^D</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: patrick</title>
		<link>http://lauriefoley.com/2009/04/facebook-pollution/comment-page-1/#comment-41</link>
		<dc:creator>patrick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Apr 2009 21:44:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lauriefoley.com/?p=675#comment-41</guid>
		<description>selective twitter status is the solution from the other side, and I&#039;ve gently recommended it to more than one friend who&#039;s been happy to get the suggestion. Only tweets you designate with #fb go to facebook; the rest remain harmlessly on twitter where they belong.

-pb</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>selective twitter status is the solution from the other side, and I&#8217;ve gently recommended it to more than one friend who&#8217;s been happy to get the suggestion. Only tweets you designate with #fb go to facebook; the rest remain harmlessly on twitter where they belong.</p>
<p>-pb</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

